laptop core i5 8350u

Get the best deals on PC Laptops & Notebooks. Shop with Afterpay on eligible items. Free delivery and returns on eBay Plus items for Plus members. Shop today! Skip to main content. Acer Aspire 5750G Laptop Computer With Bag, Intel Core i5-2450M, 8GB Ram, 750GB. AU $250.00. AU $25.00 postage. HP Elitebook 840 G5 14-inch FHD (1920x1080) Business Laptop (Intel Quad-Core i5-8250U, 8GB DDR4 RAM, 256GB SS USB Type-C, HDMI, Windows 10 Pro (Renewed) HP 3RF21UT#ABA Elitebook 840 G5 14" Notebook - Windows - Intel Core i7 1.9 GHz - 16 GB RAM - 512 GB SSD, Silver Buy the Microsoft Book 2 1832 13.5-inch Laptop (i5-8350U Quad-core processor/8GB/256GB SSD/Windows 10 Home/Integrated Graphics), Platinum that comes with striking features and specifications. This ideal computing device is powered with a Intel i5-8350U quad-core with 1.7 GHz clock speed that lets you multitask without any lags or interruptions Vay Tiền Online Chuyển Khoản Ngay. Select Your Region Sign In to access restricted content Using Search You can easily search the entire site in several ways. Brand Name Core i9 Document Number 123456 Code Name Alder Lake Special Operators “Ice Lake”, Ice AND Lake, Ice OR Lake, Ice* Quick Links You can also try the quick links below to see results for most popular searches. Product Information Support Drivers & Software Recent Searches Sign In to access restricted content Advanced Search Only search in Title Description Content ID Sign in to access restricted content. The browser version you are using is not recommended for this consider upgrading to the latest version of your browser by clicking one of the following links. Safari Chrome Edge Firefox Discover newer Intel Processors and experience Improved performance Sorry we are not able to load the pricing info at this moment. Compare Intel Products Essentials Recommended Customer Price CPU Specifications Intel Turbo Boost Technology Frequency‡ Configurable TDP-up Base Frequency Configurable TDP-down Base Frequency Supplemental Information Embedded Options Available Memory Specifications Max Memory Size dependent on memory type Processor Graphics Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency Graphics Video Max Memory Max Resolution eDP - Integrated Flat Panel‡ Intel Clear Video HD Technology Intel Clear Video Technology of Displays Supported ‡ Expansion Options PCI Express Configurations ‡ 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 Max of PCI Express Lanes Package Specifications Advanced Technologies Intel Optane™ Memory Supported ‡ Intel Speed Shift Technology Intel Turbo Boost Technology ‡ Intel Hyper-Threading Technology ‡ Intel Transactional Synchronization Extensions Instruction Set Extensions Intel Intel Intel AVX2 Intel My WiFi Technology Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology Thermal Monitoring Technologies Intel Flex Memory Access Intel Identity Protection Technology ‡ Intel Smart Response Technology Security & Reliability Intel vPro Eligibility ‡ Intel AES New Instructions Intel Software Guard Extensions Intel SGX Intel Trusted Execution Technology ‡ Intel Stable IT Platform Program SIPP Intel Virtualization Technology VT-x ‡ Intel Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O VT-d ‡ Intel VT-x with Extended Page Tables EPT ‡ All information provided is subject to change at any time, without notice. Intel may make changes to manufacturing life cycle, specifications, and product descriptions at any time, without notice. The information herein is provided "as-is" and Intel does not make any representations or warranties whatsoever regarding accuracy of the information, nor on the product features, availability, functionality, or compatibility of the products listed. Please contact system vendor for more information on specific products or systems. Intel classifications are for general, educational and planning purposes only and consist of Export Control Classification Numbers ECCN and Harmonized Tariff Schedule HTS numbers. Any use made of Intel classifications are without recourse to Intel and shall not be construed as a representation or warranty regarding the proper ECCN or HTS. Your company as an importer and/or exporter is responsible for determining the correct classification of your transaction. Refer to Datasheet for formal definitions of product properties and features. ‡ This feature may not be available on all computing systems. Please check with the system vendor to determine if your system delivers this feature, or reference the system specifications motherboard, processor, chipset, power supply, HDD, graphics controller, memory, BIOS, drivers, virtual machine monitor-VMM, platform software, and/or operating system for feature compatibility. Functionality, performance, and other benefits of this feature may vary depending on system configuration. Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families. See for details. System and Maximum TDP is based on worst case scenarios. Actual TDP may be lower if not all I/Os for chipsets are used. “Announced” SKUs are not yet available. Please refer to the Launch Date for market availability. Intel Iris Xe Graphics only to use the Intel Iris Xe brand, the system must be populated with 128-bit dual channel memory. Otherwise, use the Intel UHD brand. Max Turbo Frequency refers to the maximum single-core processor frequency that can be achieved with Intel Turbo Boost Technology. See for more information and applicability of this technology. See for more information including details on which processors support Intel HT Technology. Processors that support 64-bit computing on Intel architecture require an Intel 64 architecture-enabled BIOS. Check for systems that support Intel Identity Protection Technology Intel IPT. Intel Smart Response Technology requires a select Intel Core™ processor, an enabled chipset, Intel Rapid Storage Technology software, and a properly configured hybrid drive HDD + small SSD. Depending on system configuration, your results may vary. Contact your system manufacturer for more information. Some products can support AES New Instructions with a Processor Configuration update, in particular, i7-2630QM/i7-2635QM, i7-2670QM/i7-2675QM, i5-2430M/i5-2435M, i5-2410M/i5-2415M. Please contact OEM for the BIOS that includes the latest Processor configuration update. Reliable business partner. Today’s Latitude 7490 configuration packs a quad-core Core i5-8350U and conventional SATA storage, and it makes a few more cuts to deflate the cost a bit. Even so, this remains an impressive machine. How does this configuration stand up to its competitors?Back in April, we reviewed Dell’s latest 14-inch Latitude 7000 series machine, the Latitude 7490. Unsurprisingly, we found our test unit to be overall excellent in keeping with the trends of its forebears. While it’s true that the 7490 is primarily an iterative rather than revolutionary update—preserving the perennially-lauded magnesium casing, terrific keyboard, straightforward maintenance, and all-day battery life—this year’s revision also introduces a few other significant improvements. Apart from the obvious benefits bestowed by the quad-core Intel Kaby Lake Refresh CPUs, the touchpad has been greatly enhanced by the adoption of Windows Precision drivers, and the incorporation of Active Steering Antenna technology seems to have improved WLAN throughput and reliability to boot. Our previous review unit packed a Core i7 and one of Dell’s new embedded touch displays which are a pretty enticing alternative to the usual high-gloss touchscreens; today’s review unit dials back the CPU to a Core i5-8350U, reverts to a conventional FHD non-touch still matte display, and makes a few other minor changes. It retails currently for $1,709 directly from Dell, which is a few hundred bucks below the previous configuration. How does it stand up to fierce competitors from Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon and HP EliteBook 840 G5? Let’s dig into the data and find inch 169, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, AUO503D D04YD_B140HAN, IPS, glossy noMainboardIntel Sunrise Point-LPStorageToshiba KSG60ZMV256G, 256 GB SoundcardRealtek ALC256 Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio ControllerConnections4 USB / Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections mm combo audio, Card Reader SDNetworkingIntel Ethernet Connection I219-LM 10/100/1000MBit/s, Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/, Bluetooth x width x depth in mm x 331 x = x x inBattery60 Wh, 7500 mAh Lithium-IonOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 10 Pro 64 BitCameraWebcam 720pPrimary Camera 1 MPixAdditional featuresKeyboard Chiclet, Keyboard Light yes, 36 Months kg = oz / pounds, Power Supply 293 g = oz / poundsNote The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications. The case design hasn’t changed much since our previous review unit, so we’ll refer you to that article for our full impressions. The sole difference with today’s configuration is the exchange of the carbon fiber lid which optionally lines the back of the embedded touch panel, which today’s unit lacks for a conventional magnesium lid that we recognize from the 7480. To summarize the rest of our impressions, the nearly fully magnesium construction is as sturdy as ever, with very little flex across the base unit even under direct pressure. The display lid, likewise, remains highly resistant to torsion, and the single central hinge is stiff enough to prevent the lid from unintended vibration—though it’s impossible to open without both hands. Gaps between parts are even and small. Our single complaint is merely an aesthetic one namely, the penchant of the soft-touch material covering the surfaces for collecting and preserving fingerprints and skin oils. Otherwise, the Latitude 7490 remains one of the best-constructed business laptops on the market today. Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 Dell Latitude 7490 HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Dell Latitude 7390 DIN A4 ❌331 mm / 13 inch mm / inch mm / inch lbs331 mm / 13 inch mm / inch mm / inch lbs326 mm / inch 234 mm / inch mm / inch mm / inch mm / inch mm / inch lbs305 mm / 12 inch 208 mm / inch mm / inch lbs297 mm / inch 210 mm / inch 1 mm / inch lbs Today’s test configuration lacks the Thunderbolt port and smart card reader of the Core i7 setup we reviewed back in April, but it’s otherwise identical. The Thunderbolt port has been exchanged instead for a conventional USB Type-C with DisplayPort. Port selection and placement, as before, is overall very good—with four total USB ports if the aforementioned Type-C port is included and plenty of space between the connections, all of which are located on the left and right the Latitude’s WLAN connectivity is the esteemed Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265, which is in fact the same adapter used by all competitors in our comparison field. The Latitude 7490 edges out its peers, however, possibly thanks to its adoption of Active Steering Antenna technology which we discussed in our previous review. You can read more about this particular technology WLAN adapterAbsent from today’s review unit is the touch fingerprint reader that occupied the right palmrest of the configuration we reviewed a couple of months ago—along with the NFC reader. As previously mentioned, the smart card reader is also missing. Finally, the IR camera for Windows Hello and facial recognition has been replaced by a conventional webcam. However, the typical Dell Client Command Suite and related software are still today’s unit trades the Thunderbolt port for a traditional USB Type-C/DisplayPort instead, Thunderbolt docks such as the Dell TB16 won’t work. Instead, users will need to opt for a USB or USB Type-C dock, which will still probably suffice for the average user. No accessories were included with our review system apart from a 65 W AC ease of the disassembly process has not changed since our last review; some eight captive Phillips Head screws secure the bottom cover, and nearly every replaceable component is available immediately beneath the panel. One gripe which still applies here is that the keyboard is among the hardest of all FRUs to replace since it’s beneath the motherboard—though this is unfortunately a pretty common trend these days thanks to the thinness of the devices populating even the business segment which are more and more akin to their consumer-grade counterparts as the years pass. There’s also an adhesive lining the LCD panel to help keep a consistent seal between the bezel and display that’s perilous during disassembly. In the event of a broken screen, technicians will need to take care to separate the bezel and panel surround without damaging anything. On the other hand, a notable advantage of the Latitude design is the incorporation of a plug-in DC jack rather than a conventional design in which it is soldered to the board. This makes DC jack replacements relatively painless, far easier than the full disassembly, board removal, and desolder/solder work that is required for a traditional broken DC US Latitude 7490 machines ship with a 3-year, on-site warranty after remote diagnosis from Dell. Various upgrades are available, including longer warranty terms and ProSupport/ProSupport Plus packages which include North American dedicated support specialists. Please see our Guarantees, Return policies and Warranties FAQ for country-specific Alongside Lenovo’s ThinkPad devices, Dell Latitude 5000 and 7000 laptops consistently possess some of the highest-rated keyboards around. The Latitude 7490 is no exception; its chiclet keys are well-spaced, the layout is familiar, and visibility is very good thanks to the black keys with white labels and a two-stage backlight that’s mostly even. Actuation force is medium and travel is lengthy—roughly 2 mm—with a good sense of feedback that supports fast typing without obtrusive noise. There is no “clatter” or unintended movement of keys. Overall, it’s an excellent keyboard and easily among the best we’ve reviewed. Touchpad Majorly improved over last generation’s version on the Latitude 7480 is the Alps touchpad, which now supports Microsoft Precision drivers for a notably more responsive and smooth operation. We had absolutely no problems during our time with the unit; pointer movement is quick and without delay. Although it's not quite as large as the touchpads from some competitors, we didn't struggle much with real estate for the typical gestures, which are reliably interpreted. The two buttons below the pad are quiet yet springy and comfortable for long-term use—far better than most any integrated Latitude 7490 retains the 1920x1080 resolution, but exchanges the embedded touch display of our previous unit with a conventional IPS, non-touch, matte panel. Subjectively, color seems vivid, contrast appears strong, and brightness is fairly good. Our measurements revealed an average brightness of 294 cd/m²—ever-so-slightly below that of the embedded touch model—and a very good contrast ratio of 13421. While the ThinkPad T480s and the EliteBook 840 G5 in our comparison table only achieve results slightly above these, the X1 Carbon absolutely blows them all away with an average brightness of 533 cd/m²—and the 840 G5 offers a superior FHD IPS display option with a mind-blowing 630 cd/m² result. While today’s screen is certainly nice enough, Dell should consider stepping up their options for the next model to stay in competition. Our display did exhibit some unfortunate backlight bleed in the lower left and right corners, as well as near the top right corner. As a whole, brightness distribution was fairly good, however, at 89%. Distribution of brightnessAUO503D D04YD_B140HANX-Rite i1Pro Basic 2Maximum cd/m² Nits Average 294 cd/m² Minimum cd/m²Brightness Distribution 89 %Center on Battery cd/m²Contrast 13421 Black cd/m²ΔE Color calibrated Greyscale sRGB Argyll 3D62% AdobeRGB 1998 Argyll 3D AdobeRGB 1998 Argyll 3D sRGB Argyll 3D Display P3 Argyll 3DGamma Latitude 7490AUO503D D04YD_B140HAN, IPS, 1920x1080HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAAUO3B3D, IPS, 1920x1080Dell Latitude 7390LGD059B, IPS, 1920x1080Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00LP140QH2-SPB1, IPS, 2560x1440Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon IPS, 2560x1440Dell Latitude 7490AU Optronics AU0223D, IPS, 1920x1080Display-10%0%6%27%-6% Display P3 -10% 2% 9% 32% -5% sRGB -9% -2% 1%100 3% -8% AdobeRGB 1998 -10% 0% 9% 47% -5%Response Times-1%9%10%-25%-9% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * ?22, ? ?18, ? ? ? Response Time Black / White *32 ? ?18, ? ? ? 18-8% ? PWM FrequencyScreen5%7%1%36%-6%Brightness 34% -2%352 14%578 87% 6%Brightness294387 32%289 -2%343 17%533 81%305 4%Brightness Distribution8987 -2%86 -3%91 2%84 -6%87 -2%Black Level * -9% -35% -100% -65% -61%Contrast13421656 23%980 -27%765 -43%1521 13%887 -34%Colorchecker dE 2000 * 9% 52% 46% 69% 37%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * 6% 45% 31% 64% 47%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * -38% -3% 52% -110%Greyscale dE 2000 * 12% 49% 27%3 59%3 59% 107% 95% 104% 99% 103% 93%CCT7269 89%7811 83%6323 103%6452 101%6377 102%6962 93%Color Space Percent of AdobeRGB 1998 -8%63 2% 10% 43%58 -6%Color Space Percent of sRGB -9%95 -2%98 1%100 3%88 -9%Total Average Program / Settings-2% / 1%5% / 6%6% / 3%13% / 27%-7% / -7%* ... smaller is betterColor coverage is good at 97% of sRGB and 62% of AdobeRGB. This is roughly in line with the performance of HP’s EliteBook 840 G5, which just barely edges it out. However, the X1 Carbon runs away with the crown with a whopping 89% of AdobeRGB; the 7490 manages to cover just 64% of its displayed color of the box, the 7490’s color accuracy measurements were only average. Using CalMAN, we recorded an average ColorChecker DeltaE2000 of and a maximum of White, along wide a Greyscale DeltaE2000 average of The CCT Average of 7269 is also on the cool side, and our Total Gamma reading of is below the ideal value of A bit of calibration works wonders; afterwards, ColorChecker and Greyscale DeltaE average values dropped to just and respectively. Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry ghosting. Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise↘ ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for comparison, all tested devices range from minimum to 240 maximum ms. » 83 % of all devices are means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices ms. ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise↘ ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for comparison, all tested devices range from minimum to 636 maximum ms. » 60 % of all devices are means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices ms. Screen Flickering / PWM Pulse-Width ModulationℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation PWM . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19210 minimum 5 - maximum 3846000 Hz was measured. The panel’s response times are a bit on the slow side, but PWM is not used for brightness management. Reflections are no problem for the Latitude 7480, which—thanks to its good brightness and contrast and anti-glare finish—is usable in all but the brightest of environments. Viewing angles of the IPS panel are one RAM slot is occupied in our review Latitude 7490 machines pack Kaby Lake Refresh 8th generation Intel CPUs ranging from dual-core Core i3 options up to quad-core Core i7 SoCs; all of the available chips operate under the constraints of 15 W TDP. While our previous review unit featured a Core i7 and 8 GB of dual-channel memory, today’s machine dials it back to an Intel Core i5-8350U and 8 GB of single-channel memory. As it often does with the recent Latitude models, LatencyMon reported some issues with DPC latencies—which could translate to issues streaming real-time audio and video. Performance is not diminished while operating unplugged, however; a second run of 3DMark 11 on battery power resulted in a score of 1771, which is close enough to our original score to dispel any R15While the 8th-generation Intel CPUs all tend to experience an initial short burst of performance before subsiding somewhat, the Intel Core i7 in our previous 7490 review unit still distances itself from the Core i5-8350U in our CPU tests—ahead by some 9% and 15% in the Cinebench R15 multi- and single-core tests, respectively. After the first few runs, average multi-core scores are closer to the 530 mark in our tests—again, below the less-consistent but still quite a bit higher roughly 570 we received over the long-term from the Core i7 model. Compared with the rest of its peers, the 7490 roughly matches the EliteBook 840 G5, but it’s well below both the larger ThinkPad T480s and Core i7-equipped X1 Carbon. The Core i7 model fares better here, so if more power is needed, we’d recommend springing for that one. Naturally, however, for most users, today’s specifications will be perfectly R15 CPU Single 64Bit153 Points Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit569 Points Cinebench R15 OpenGL fps Cinebench R15 Ref. Match % Help 0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600TooltipCinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Whereas the Core i7 setup was close to the top in most of our general productivity benchmarks, today’s unit hovers around the middle of the pack, and ever-so-slightly below average for all notebooks powered by this CPU currently in our database. The PCMark 8 Work Score of 4906 is very good, while the PCMark 10 overall score of 3564 is slightly less impressive. The primary reason for today’s lower scores is probably the surrender of NVMe storage in favor of less expensive conventional SATA storage. At any rate, subjectively speaking, the machine seems nimble 8 Home Score Accelerated v2Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 4029 Points ∼61% +8%Average of class Office 1275 - 5686, n=15, last 2 years 4008 Points ∼60% +8%Dell Latitude 7390UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 3886 Points ∼58% +4%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 3752 Points ∼56% +1%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 3723 Points ∼56% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G 3652 Points ∼55% -2%Average Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 3063 - 3776, n=7 3566 Points ∼54% -4%Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 3503 Points ∼53% -6% Work Score Accelerated v2Dell Latitude 7390UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 5197 Points ∼73% +6%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 5155 Points ∼73% +5%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 4906 Points ∼69% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G 4832 Points ∼68% -2%Average Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 4200 - 4906, n=6 4669 Points ∼66% -5%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 4664 Points ∼66% -5%Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 4508 Points ∼63% -8%Average of class Office 1854 - 5610, n=13, last 2 years 3584 Points ∼50% -27%PCMark 10 ScoreAverage of class Office 2325 - 6418, n=107, last 2 years 4956 Points ∼49% +39%Dell Latitude 7390UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 4053 Points ∼40% +14%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 3905 Points ∼38% +10%Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 3602 Points ∼35% +1%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 3564 Points ∼35% Average Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 3004 - 3764, n=6 3534 Points ∼35% -1%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 3429 Points ∼34% -4%HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G 2429 Points ∼24% -32% EssentialsAverage of class Office 5095 - 11807, n=107, last 2 years 9397 Points ∼72% +27%Dell Latitude 7390UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 8253 Points ∼64% +12%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 7929 Points ∼61% +7%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 7849 Points ∼60% +6%Average Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 6994 - 7995, n=5 7617 Points ∼59% +3%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 7376 Points ∼57% Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 7358 Points ∼57% 0%HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G 7139 Points ∼55% -3% ProductivityDell Latitude 7390UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 7142 Points ∼57% +25%Average of class Office 3053 - 9512, n=107, last 2 years 6981 Points ∼55% +22%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 6727 Points ∼53% +18%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 6521 Points ∼52% +14%HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G 5844 Points ∼46% +2%Average Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 5004 - 6238, n=5 5760 Points ∼46% +1%Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 5739 Points ∼46% 0%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 5721 Points ∼45% PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 3723 pointsPCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 4906 pointsPCMark 10 Score 3564 pointsHelp Predictably, storage speeds are well below those of the previous 7490, since this machine steps down to a Toshiba SATA drive from an NVMe Samsung PM961. Thanks to this, today’s unit is by far the lowest-scoring of all those in our field. Nevertheless as we alluded to above, once a certain level of performance is reached, most users aren’t likely to notice any difference. Plus, the replacement/upgrade procedure as we covered previously is simple—so if cost trumps top-end performance concerns, this would be a logical place to pull Latitude 7490Toshiba KSG60ZMV256GDell Latitude 7490Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHPHP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAToshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256GDell Latitude 7390Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHPLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQAverage Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G AS SSD135%19%113%238%0% Copy Game MB/ Copy Program MB/ Copy ISO MB/ Score Total9472350 148%1232 30%2215 134%3529 273%947 0% Score Write357536 50%376 5%501 40%1801 404%357 0% Score Read3911242 218%603 54%1158 196%1168 199%391 0% Access Time Write * 46% 5% 43% 52% -0% Access Time Read * 64% -187% 44% 74% -0% 4K-64 33% 0% 22%1529 516%248 0% 4K-64 202% 31%932 195%876 177%316 0% 4K 45% 18% 45% 70% 0% 4K 81% 9% 85% 97% 0% Seq 212%339 15%830 181%1376 367%295 0% Seq 391%1611 231%1761 262%2396 393%486 0%* ... smaller is betterCDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1 533 MB/s CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1 MB/s CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1 MB/s CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1 206 MB/s CDM 5 Read Seq MB/s CDM 5 Write Seq MB/s CDM 5/6 Read 4K MB/s CDM 5/6 Write 4K MB/s Today’s Latitude not only dials back the CPU as discussed above, but it also downgrades the RAM configuration to single-channel—which does in fact affect the performance of integrated graphics. As a result, our scores are some 16% to 22% below those of the 7490 we reviewed in April, and near the bottom of the pack overall which the X1 Carbon dominates. Needless to say, this isn’t enough horsepower to run any modern games at even low settings—but the Latitude 7490 isn’t a gaming machine. If graphical performance is of any significant concern, we’d advise springing for the higher-end configurations with both Core i7 CPU and dual-channel memory if 111280x720 Performance GPUAverage of class Office 599 - 11538, n=122, last 2 years 5070 Points ∼4% +208%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U 1901 Points ∼2% +15%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 1144 - 3432, n=244 1749 Points ∼2% +6%Dell Latitude 7390Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U 1697 Points ∼1% +3%HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAIntel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 1653 Points ∼1% 0%Dell Latitude 7490Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U 1648 Points ∼1% Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 1633 Points ∼1% -1%1280x720 Performance CombinedAverage of class Office 461 - 9720, n=122, last 2 years 3925 Points ∼13% +199%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U 1880 Points ∼6% +43%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 927 - 2505, n=244 1578 Points ∼5% +20%Dell Latitude 7390Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U 1390 Points ∼5% +6%Dell Latitude 7490Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U 1313 Points ∼4% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAIntel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 1261 Points ∼4% -4%Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 1220 Points ∼4% -7%3DMark1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard GraphicsAverage of class Office 5681 - 46247, n=112, last 2 years 21387 Points ∼6% +169%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U 10123 Points ∼3% +27%Dell Latitude 7490Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U 9730 Points ∼3% +22%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 6205 - 16400, n=225 9262 Points ∼2% +17%Dell Latitude 7390Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U 8247 Points ∼2% +4%HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAIntel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 8181 Points ∼2% +3%Dell Latitude 7490Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U 7943 Points ∼2% Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 7658 Points ∼2% -4%1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsAverage of class Office 712 - 8114, n=121, last 2 years 3569 Points ∼4% +257%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U 1283 Points ∼1% +28%Dell Latitude 7490Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U 1163 Points ∼1% +16%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 557 - 2608, n=213 1161 Points ∼1% +16%HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAIntel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 1009 Points ∼1% +1%Dell Latitude 7490Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U 1001 Points ∼1% Dell Latitude 7390Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U 977 Points ∼1% -2%Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 963 Points ∼1% -4%1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme GraphicsAverage of class Office 29235 - 96779, n=12, last 2 years 52849 Points ∼7% Dell Latitude 7390Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U 44697 Points ∼6% Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 26409 - 59483, n=71 42924 Points ∼6% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAIntel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 42507 Points ∼6% Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U 37734 Points ∼5% 3DMark 11 Performance 1797 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score 7414 points3DMark Fire Strike Score 934 pointsHelp BioShock Infinite1280x720 Very Low Preset sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 52 fps ∼10% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G fps ∼8% -19%Dell Latitude 7390UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 56 fps ∼11% +8%Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ fps ∼8% -14%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ fps ∼11% +9%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 53 fps ∼10% +2%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 - n=187 fps ∼11% +17%Average of class Office 23 - n=3, last 2 years fps ∼13% +28%1366x768 Medium Preset sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 35 fps ∼8% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G 26 fps ∼6% -26%Dell Latitude 7390UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 30 fps ∼7% -14%Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ fps ∼6% -19%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ fps ∼8% +3%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 35 fps ∼8% 0%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 - n=187 fps ∼7% -6%Average of class Office - n=3, last 2 years fps ∼10% +32%1366x768 High Preset sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 24 fps ∼6% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G fps ∼5% -11%Dell Latitude 7390UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 24 fps ∼6% 0%Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ fps ∼6% -2%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ fps ∼7% +27%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 30 fps ∼7% +25%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 - n=187 fps ∼7% +15%Average of class Office - n=3, last 2 years 49 fps ∼12% +104%1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 DDOF sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 8 fps ∼3% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G fps ∼3% -9%Dell Latitude 7390UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 8 fps ∼3% 0%Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ fps ∼3% -4%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ fps ∼4% +30%Dell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP 10 fps ∼4% +25%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 - 17, n=176 fps ∼3% +15%Average of class Office last 2 years fps ∼12% +310%Metro Last Light1024x768 Low DX10 AF4x sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 31 fps ∼16% Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 - 41, n=5 fps ∼16% 0%1366x768 Medium DX10 AF4x sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 23 fps ∼12% Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 - 28, n=4 fps ∼11% -3%1366x768 High DX11 AF16x sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 15 fps ∼8% Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 13 - 16, n=3 fps ∼8% -2%1920x1080 Very High DX11 AF16x sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 6 fps ∼3% Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 6 - 8, n=3 fps ∼4% +11%Rise of the Tomb Raider1024x768 Lowest Preset sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 17 fps ∼3% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G fps ∼4% +6%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ fps ∼22% +551%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 - n=82 fps ∼4% +26%1366x768 Medium Preset AF2x sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 11 fps ∼3% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G fps ∼3% -1%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ fps ∼12% +348%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 - n=62 13 fps ∼3% +18%1920x1080 High Preset AAFX AF4x sort by valueDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 6 fps ∼2% HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G fps ∼2% +5%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 32 fps ∼8% +433%Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 - 32, n=42 fps ∼2% +21%As we’d expect from our previous tests, full stress sees an initial jump to max turbo frequencies of GHz and concomitant core temperature jumps to 98 °C, but several seconds later the machine relents and we instead witness drops to around the – GHz range, where it remains thereafter. GPU stress by itself, meanwhile, isn’t quite as challenging for the system; clock rates are fairly consistent within the 1000 – 1100 MHz range, and temperatures reach 88 °C. Combined stress results in temperatures quickly rocketing into the mid-90s C shortly followed by a drop in clock rates to GHz CPU and 900 MHz GPU. This is fairly common behavior for similarly-equipped machines. CPU Clock GHz GPU Clock MHz Average CPU Temperature °C Average GPU Temperature °C Prime95 Stress - - 78 - FurMark Stress - 1000 - 1100 - 88 Prime95 + FurMark Stress 900 76 76 The internal system fanThe Latitude 7490 never was a loud machine, and it’s even quieter with today’s less power-hungry configuration. By slim margins, it’s in fact the quietest machine in our field, topping out at just dBA and averaging under load a mere dBA—barely above the ambient noise measurement of dBA. Like all of its competitors, while idling, the fan rarely even engages; and even when it does, noise levels barely increase to a paltry dBA. We did not detect any coil whine from our Latitude 7490 review unit. Noise Level Idle / / dBALoad / dBA 30 dBsilent40 dBAaudible50 dBAloud min , med , max BK Precision 732A 15 cm distance environment noise dBAFan noise profileDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256GHP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAUHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256GDell Latitude 7390UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHPLenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQDell Latitude 7490UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHPNoise-5%-2%-5%-4%-3%off / environment * -2% -0% -2% -2% -0%Idle Minimum * -2% -0% -2% -2% -0%Idle Average * -2% -0% -2% -2% -0%Idle Maximum * -15% 2% -1% -13% -9%Load Average * -18% -5% -23% -17% -6%Load Maximum * 12% -6% 3% 13% -2%* ... smaller is betterThe cooling system is identical to that of the 7480Temperatures haven’t changed much since the Core i7 model, with load averages on top/bottom °C and °C, respectively within a degree C of the previous measurements—though room temperatures were also a degree higher during today’s measurements, so it’s really closer to °C or so of a drop. Idle values are actually higher, which might be an idiosyncrasy of firmware or something similar because no other logical explanation suffices. Here, we recorded values of °C and °C, well above room temperatures. Unfortunately, while stressed, most of the heat is concentrated near the rear center and right side of the device the left side while sitting upright, so lap-based use during any sort of significant load is likely to become uncomfortable in short order. °C113 °C105 F33 °C91 F °C101 °C104 °C88 F 30 °C86 °C87 °C82 F Maximum °C = 113 FAverage °C = 95 F °C92 °C125 °C119 °C85 F38 °C100 F41 °C106 °C83 F33 °C91 °C94 F Maximum °C = 125 FAverage °C = 100 F Power Supply max. °C = 99 F Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer± The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is °C / 95 F, compared to the average of °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.- The maximum temperature on the upper side is °C / 113 F, compared to the average of °C / 94 F, ranging from to °C for the class Office.- The bottom heats up to a maximum of °C / 125 F, compared to the average of °C / 98 F+ In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of °C / 85 F.+ The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of °C / F and are therefore cool to the touch. - The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was °C / 82 F °C / F. The two down-firing, bottom-mounted speakers in the Latitude 7490 can’t hold a candle to those of the older and thicker Latitude 7000 models such as the 7440 and 7450, but they’re still better that most other direct competitors. Volume is merely average at dB, but mids and highs are balanced and at least inoffensive in terms of their linearity. Bass, as always, is mostly absent. dBA 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper rangehide median Pink NoiseDell Latitude 7490Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900Frequency diagram checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devicesDell Latitude 7490 audio analysis± speaker loudness is average but good dBBass 100 - 315 Hz± reduced bass - on average lower than median± linearity of bass is average delta to prev. frequencyMids 400 - 2000 Hz+ balanced mids - only away from median± linearity of mids is average delta to prev. frequencyHighs 2 - 16 kHz+ balanced highs - only away from median± linearity of highs is average delta to prev. frequencyOverall 100 - Hz± linearity of overall sound is average difference to medianCompared to same class» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 73% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 51%Compared to all devices tested» 27% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 67% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 audio analysis+ speakers can play relatively loud dBBass 100 - 315 Hz- nearly no bass - on average lower than median± linearity of bass is average delta to prev. frequencyMids 400 - 2000 Hz+ balanced mids - only away from median± linearity of mids is average 9% delta to prev. frequencyHighs 2 - 16 kHz+ balanced highs - only away from median+ highs are linear 4% delta to prev. frequencyOverall 100 - Hz± linearity of overall sound is average difference to medianCompared to same class» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 57% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 51%Compared to all devices tested» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%Partially because of its lack of NVMe storage, the Latitude 7490 is an extremely efficient device while idling. We measured just W average, with min/max values of 2/ W. This is the lowest of any machine we’re comparing today. Perhaps even more impressive is the measured maximum of W—well below most other machines, and even nearly 5 W below that of its Core i7/NVMe-equipped Latitude 7490i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAi5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, Latitude 7390i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, Latitude 7490i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, Consumption-46%-26%-55%-69%-30%Idle Minimum * -60% -65% -55% -90% -55%Idle Average * -40% -26% -45% -89% -38%Idle Maximum * -67% -9% -77% -109% -33%Load Average * 6% -13% -26% -24%43 -12%Load Maximum * -69% -16% -72% -35% -13%* ... smaller is betterThe internal 60 Wh batteryWe recorded a battery runtime of 9 hours and 8 minutes in our standardized web surfing benchmark, which is slightly above competitors like the ThinkPad T480s and X1 Carbon, and well above the HP EliteBook 840 G5’s 7 hours and 27 minutes. The Latitude 7390 with its slightly smaller screen easily takes the cake here, however, with a terrific result of 11 hours and 4 Latitude 7490i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 WhHP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EAi5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 WhDell Latitude 7390i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 WhLenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 WhLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 WhDell Latitude 7490i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 WhBattery RuntimeWiFi -18%664 21%537 -2%519 -5%561 2%Pros+ durable and solid case construction + attractive, subdued, soft-touch exterior + good general system performance + terrific keyboard + greatly improved touchpad thanks to Windows Precision drivers + strong selection of ports and convenient layout + long battery life + excellent wi-fi performance and stability + easy maintenance + quiet operationCons- competitors offer superior display options - thermal design could be improved; warm while idling and under load - speakers are weak compared to older Latitude machines - combined system stress results in throttled performanceThe Dell Latitude 7490Once again, we come away from a Dell Latitude 7000 series machine thoroughly impressed. Along with Lenovo’s ThinkPads and HP’s EliteBooks, the Latitudes stand head and shoulders above the rest of the business competition. They’re thoughtfully designed, smartly updated, and carefully revised. While the 7490 remains a mere iterative update to the 7480 in every sense of the term, it truly leaves little to be desired. The case is sturdy, subdued, and attractive, the weight is manageable, the input devices are top-notch, performance is very good, battery life is lengthy, and it’s a quiet companion. The few areas of improvement we’d like to see are display options to match its competitors, improved thermal management, and better speakers. Once again, we come away from a Dell Latitude 7000 series machine thoroughly impressed. Today’s $1,709 Latitude 7490 absolutely deserves consideration by anyone in the market for a premium business less expensive configuration lacks the Core i7, NVMe storage, touchscreen, and some of the biometric and security features of April’s review unit—but it’s also only $1,709 as compared to over $2,000 for the previous model. Those who don’t require dual-channel memory or any of the previously listed omissions would find little to complain about in this setup. CPU performance is roughly between 10 and 15 percent below that of the Core i7-equipped unit, and GPU performance around 15 to 22 percent lower though this is also a factor of dual-channel memory in our i7 configuration. As such, we’d suggest that upgrading to that SKU only makes sense if top-end CPU and GPU performance is of the utmost importance. Alongside the X1 Carbon, T480s, EliteBook 840 G5, and Latitude 7390, the Latitude 7490 absolutely deserves consideration by anyone in the market for a premium business laptop. Dell Latitude 7490 - 06/21/2018 v6old Steve Schardein Connectivity73 / 80 → 91% Games Performance57 / 68 → 84% Application Performance91 / 92 → 99% Office - Weighted Average Pricecompare Steve Schardein - Tech Writer - 98 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012In grade school, my first computer—an Apple IIGS—started it all for me. Later, in the nineties, if I wasn’t repairing computers for family and friends, I was busy cooking up nifty Visual Basic projects and playing PC games like Command & Conquer and Heroes of Might and Magic. Soon, much of my free time was spent moderating popular gaming forums and covering the industry for various websites. All the while, I never stopped repairing computers, and in 2006, I started a technology consulting company in Louisville. Today, I am truly living my dream still a child at heart, ever-curious, constantly learning, and thankful to you, our readers. Steve Schardein, 2018-06-21 Update 2019-03- 9 Laptops with Intel Core i5-8350U CommissionsEarned HP EliteBook 840 G5 ProcessorIntel Core i5-8350U VideoCardIntel UHD Graphics 620 RAM8GB RAM STORAGE512GB SSD Full HD 1920 x 1080, IPS Detailed review Check Price Dell Latitude 7390 ProcessorIntel Core i5-8350U VideoCardIntel UHD Graphics 620 RAM8GB RAM STORAGE512GB SSD Full HD 1920 x 1080, IPS Detailed review Check Price Dell Latitude 7390 ProcessorIntel Core i5-8350U VideoCardIntel UHD Graphics 620 RAM8GB RAM STORAGE256GB SSD Full HD 1920 x 1080, IPS Detailed review Check Price Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 6 ProcessorIntel Core i5-8350U VideoCardIntel UHD Graphics 620 RAM8GB RAM STORAGE256GB SSD Full HD 1920 x 1080, IPS Check Price View all results

laptop core i5 8350u